The whole workflow, in forty-eight seconds
Watch an investment team get from a full inbox to a decision it can defend: the funnel screened against their own mandate, the team choosing what advances, then verifiable claims checked at the source.
What the video shows
Three moves, in order, and only one of them is ours.
- Screen broadly
- Every opportunity you are shown, ranked against your own mandate. Up to forty run concurrently rather than queueing behind whoever had a spare hour that week.
- Your team chooses
- Screening does not produce an investment score. It answers one question: does this deserve your team’s time? What advances is a decision a person makes.
- Deep diligence
- Verifiable claims checked at the source: company registers, filings, patent authorities and the databases relevant to the business. Contradictions are surfaced, not smoothed over.
- Fund Fit is not a company score
- Screening ranks against your mandate, not a universal grade. A strong company outside it is marked outside it rather than quietly ranked low.
- Three sources, never merged
- Company claims, outside evidence and Aventro’s analysis stay separate and traceable. Where two disagree, the report says so instead of averaging them.
- What it could not confirm is named
- A patent family with no record on the register is reported as unresolved, and labelled as such rather than treated as evidence of absence.
Aventro provides data, analysis and decision-support tools only and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. Investment decisions remain solely with the investor. See the full disclaimer.