Scoring
Acme Corp· Series A Due Diligence
Readiness
Weighted from 5 modules
▲ 9 since last
Verdict
Decision support · not investment advice
Open flags
Cap table.xlsx
Ownership doesn't reconcile
Module breakdown
Weight · Score
How the score is built
The readiness score is a weighted roll-up of scored modules, each with criteria you can read.
- 14 modules, 11 of them weighted
- Each module scores against a rubric of sub-factors tied to the evidence behind them. The other 3 run for context and carry no weight, so they inform the report without moving the number.
- Verified evidence moves the number
- A claim with no supporting document earns nothing. Verifying it against an outside source is what raises the score.
- Every number is traceable
- Open any module in the report to see the sub-factors, the evidence, and the reasoning that produced the score.
Evidence-linked sub-factors
Each module scores against a rubric, and every sub-factor ties back to a document. No evidence, no credit.
Readiness verdicts, not vibes
Scores roll up to a decision-support verdict the report explains factor by factor. Never investment advice.
Weights set by your thesis
Module and sub-factor weights are set per organisation and applied across every deal your team runs. A fund whose edge is technical depth should not be scored on a generic weighting.
From claims to conviction.
Bring one live deal. Twenty minutes later you have the full pass: what checks out, what does not, and what we got wrong. No pitch.